Tag Archives: afterlife

AI technology has seemingly immersed itself in every part of our lives, so why not in our afterlives as well?

The concept of “generative ghosts” is outlined in a research paper released in 2024 that includes a Google DeepMind scientist as a contributor. Since then, thanks to a grant from Google, the research continues while at the same time, enterprising AI companies are swooping in to offer products and services. I’ve been following the trend over the last year.

In the paper, the researchers defined generative ghosts as “AI agents that represent a deceased person.” According to the researchers, this differs from a static “griefbot” program where you could have chats with your deceased grandmother about her life based upon data you provide, such as letters, journals and audio and video files to create the information source that the AI chatbot would rely on to provide responses. With generative ghosts, the program is able to create novel content and evolve over time. An example would be a grandmother offering advice on her granddaughter’s wedding day, years after the grandmother’s death.

While some may find such a concept creepy, I can see its benefits especially for younger generations, who have been raised solely in a digital world and who may not have the same emotional connection that older generations have to low-tech sources of family history such as photo albums and scrapbooks. A griefbot that’s a phone app or an avatar of grandma in a short web video sharing her beloved recipe for chocolate chip cookies might be more impactful for younger relatives. Generative ghosts could be tailored to interact with relatives of a variety of ages, serving as a generational bridge to ancestors.

Of course there are many ethical and practical considerations to ponder when it comes to such a concept, which the research paper outlines. One question is whether the generative ghost would speak in first person, as if they were actually the deceased loved one, or in third person, representing the loved one. The form in which the generative ghost assumes is also a question to consider: does it remain in a digital format, exist in a virtual reality world, or does it take on a physical form like a robot? Does the generative ghost remain in its own time period or does it grow in its understanding of current events is another interesting question. One of the most intriguing questions that I found in the research paper was whether the generative ghosts should be allowed to earn income, if say, your relative was a successful author.

The impact of generative ghosts to society could present a host of benefits and consequences. While it could help some through the painful grieving process, it could also interfere with a person’s ability to move on with their lives after the death of a loved one. As with any digital tool, there is the risk of cybercriminals to hack and hijack personal data.

If you could create a generative ghost of a deceased loved one, who would you choose?

Image created by Google Gemini.